What is a rubric?
Rubrics are formal systems for deciding how to describe the quality of a variety of products, activities, processes, and behaviors. These descriptions may be used for formative feedback, determination of student grades, or data for assessment of performance on a specific student learning outcome.
Examples of materials that can be evaluated with a rubric
Rubrics can be used in a variety of ways
Types of rubrics
Holistic Rubric
Rubric consists of a set of descriptors that generate a single, global score for the entire work.
Analytic Rubric
Rubric is comprised of a set of focused holistic rubrics for specific components that will be evaluated independently. These components might be reported separately or they might be combined to create a global score that is used for determining a grade.
Components of a rubric
Performance Elements
Describe the major attributes of the work that will contribute to the overall evaluation.
Category Scale
Describe the method used to assign work to global categories or to assign points for the performance element. Points need not be assigned to categories unless you plan to combine the performance elements to compute an overall grade. If performance elements will be used as independent assessments of a specific learning outcome, category names without numerical values will be as useful as point values. If performance elements will be combined to compute an overall grade, elements can be weighted differently (or varying amounts of points assigned to categories) so that different elements can contribute more or less to the overall grade, based on their importance for the assignment.
Descriptors of the criteria used for classifying work or assigning points for an element
Describe the characteristics of the performance or work that must be present for the work to be assigned to a given level of achievement. These descriptions may include the following types of information:
Example of a Framework for a Rubric for an Essay Question |
||||
Performance Elements or Criteria |
Below |
Meets expectations |
Exceeds expectations |
Points (Weight of Element for Grade) |
| Information included is relevant to the question | 3 |
|||
| Answer is complete | 10 |
|||
| Information included in the answer is accurate | 3 |
|||
| Organization, logic, and clarity of the answer | 2 |
|||
| Mechanics of writing (spelling, punctuation, grammar) | 2 |
|||
| Total Points | 20 |
|||
Steps for constructing a rubric
Examples of scales describing level of quality:
Below Expectations |
Meets Expectations |
Exceeds Expectations |
Unacceptable |
Developing |
Acceptable |
Exemplary |
Inadequate |
Barely Adequate |
Good |
Exemplary |
Unacceptable |
Marginal |
Meets Expectations |
Exceeds Expectations |
Novice |
Developing |
Proficient |
Expert |
Missing or Serious Problems |
Below Expectations |
Meets Expectations |
Excellent Work |
Missing |
Unacceptable |
Below Expectations |
Meets Expectations |
Exceeds Expectations |
Scale for evaluating behavioral elements in a rubric (in class, in group activities, as team members, during a presentation, etc.)
Rarely |
Sometimes |
Often |
Almost Always |
How do I develop the descriptors for the categories?
One strategy is to begin by describing the characteristics of the “ideal” and the “worst case.” Intermediate examples can then be described by identifying the most common errors that make an example fall short of “ideal” or the redeeming qualities that make an example better than the “worst case.”
Another strategy is to use samples of existing work. Sort the examples into three piles corresponding to three levels of quality – the “best” work, the “worst” work, and "intermediate" work. What are the common characteristics of the examples in the “best” pile? These are the descriptors for the top category. What are the typical problems seen in the “worst” work? These are descriptors that should be included for the lowest category.
Don’t reinvent the wheel! Look at the descriptors used in an existing rubric and revise these to adapt them for your assignment. See the Examples of Rubrics page for links to a variety of rubrics.
Rubrics are fluid. Expect that after you develop your first rubric, you will think of ways to modify it the first time you use it to evaluate student work.
Use the rubric to give students feedback about their work
If you make notes on a copy of the rubric during grading, you can easily provide detailed feedback to your students by circling or highlighting components of the rubric that describe relevant qualities of the student’s work that determined your decision to assign one category of quality instead of another. This strategy can save graders time. You are no longer writing the same marginal notation on paper after paper.
This is one reason why you might want to refine and edit the rubric. You may discover characteristics or errors that appear in student work that you didn’t think about when the first rubric was developed. These can be added in the next version of the rubric.
Why use a rubric? How will using a rubric help me as a teacher?
Template for Creating a Rubric
The rubric template is Word file that contains a template for a rubric and instructions for how to use and modify the template to meet individual grading needs. Instructors can download this file and modify it as needed to construct their own rubric.
How good is your rubric?
Want to evaluate the quality of your rubric (or one you are thinking about adopting)?
Bonnie Mullinix created a rubric to evaluate rubrics for Monmouth University.
http://tltgroup.org/Mullinix/Rubrics/A_Rubric_for_Rubrics.htm
Addition information about rubrics can be found at the web sites listed in the Links to Rubrics Sites page.
Web Sites on Rubric Development
Updated 04/22/13 lrg
To report errors and/or broken links on the CUTLA website, please contact us at cutla@uwf.edu.
Center for University Teaching, Learning, and Assessment | Bldg. 53, Room 208 | 11000 University Pkwy. | Pensacola, FL 32514 | USA | (850) 473-7435 | Campus Map | Text Only | Site map